Comments on: Exploring Java and VB.Net Syntax, Part 1 http://cdmckay.org/blog/2009/02/04/exploring-java-and-vbnet-syntax-part-1/ Programming and Game Development Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:01:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: cam http://cdmckay.org/blog/2009/02/04/exploring-java-and-vbnet-syntax-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9 cam Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:10:27 +0000 http://couchware.ca/blogs/cam/?p=93#comment-9 Yeah, for sure. Like I'm not saying Java is not verbose (it's very typing heavy) but VB.NET is worse (if you can believe it). Yeah, for sure. Like I’m not saying Java is not verbose (it’s very typing heavy) but VB.NET is worse (if you can believe it).

]]> By: kev http://cdmckay.org/blog/2009/02/04/exploring-java-and-vbnet-syntax-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8 kev Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:19:44 +0000 http://couchware.ca/blogs/cam/?p=93#comment-8 Both of these languages are pretty verbose for many things. I think it would be interesting to take the same examples and compare them using a dynamically typed language like Ruby, Groovy or even JavaScript. After using them for a while, im fast becoming a believer that dynamically typed languages are the way to go. Both of these languages are pretty verbose for many things. I think it would be interesting to take the same examples and compare them using a dynamically typed language like Ruby, Groovy or even JavaScript.

After using them for a while, im fast becoming a believer that dynamically typed languages are the way to go.

]]>