<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trimming in ActionScript jQuery-style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdmckay.org/blog/2010/04/07/trimming-in-actionscript-jquery-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdmckay.org/blog/2010/04/07/trimming-in-actionscript-jquery-style/</link>
	<description>Programming and Game Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:52:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://cdmckay.org/blog/2010/04/07/trimming-in-actionscript-jquery-style/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdmckay.org/blog/?p=1344#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Great article.

I am not sure, but I think that, besides being ugly, calling the function using str[&quot;trim&quot;] will be fractionally slower than str.trim(), since the compiler will not  be able to optimize it.

That is just my thought. I don&#039;t have anything to back it up.

Still, a great idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.</p>
<p>I am not sure, but I think that, besides being ugly, calling the function using str["trim"] will be fractionally slower than str.trim(), since the compiler will not  be able to optimize it.</p>
<p>That is just my thought. I don&#8217;t have anything to back it up.</p>
<p>Still, a great idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

